Optimizing Stripe API performance in Lambda with caching strategies

/Article

When building systems that heavily interact with any external API, developers often encounter challenges around performance, cost optimization, and rate limiting. Stripe's API is powerful and well-documented, but as your application scales, you'll need to carefully manage your interactions with it, as with any external API.

There are several key challenges to consider:

  1. API rate limits: Stripe API rate limiting is a mechanism that controls the number of API requests an application can make over a specified period, primarily measured in requests per second (RPS). When users exceed these limits, they receive 429 errors. Rate limits vary by endpoint and may depend on the account's characteristics and transaction volumes.

  2. API latency: Each call to Stripe's API introduces latency to your application, typically ranging from 100ms to 500ms depending on the endpoint and operation.

  3. Costs: While Stripe doesn't charge for API usage directly, the cumulative effect of unnecessary API calls impacts your application's performance and infrastructure costs in AWS.

In this post, we'll dive deep into implementing an advanced caching architecture using AWS Lambda, Amazon ElastiCache for Redis, and Amazon DynamoDB to create a robust and scalable solution for high-volume Stripe API interactions. Let's explore how we can architect a solution to address these challenges using AWS services.

Architecture overview

This sample solution implements a multi-layer caching strategy that combines the speed of ElastiCache for Redis with the durability and TTL (Time To Live) capabilities of DynamoDB. Here's how the components work together:

Redis serves as the first-level cache, providing sub-millisecond access to frequently requested data. DynamoDB acts as the second-level cache, storing less frequently accessed data and providing automatic TTL management. Lambda functions orchestrate the interaction between these services and the Stripe API.

Implementing the cache layer

This caching strategy implements the following flow:

  1. Check Redis for the requested data.

  2. If not in Redis, check DynamoDB.

  3. If not in DynamoDB, fetch from Stripe API.

  4. Update both cache layers with the new data.

Here's a more detailed implementation:

const AWS = require('aws-sdk'); const dynamodb = new AWS.DynamoDB.DocumentClient(); async function getCustomerData(customerId) { // Check Redis first const redis = getRedisClient(); // TODO: Implementation-dependent const cachedData = await redis.get(`customer:${customerId}`); if (cachedData) { return JSON.parse(cachedData); } // Check DynamoDB const dynamoResult = await dynamodb.get({ TableName: 'stripe-cache', Key: { pk: `customer:${customerId}` } }).promise(); if (dynamoResult.Item && dynamoResult.Item.data) { // Store in Redis for future requests await redis.set( `customer:${customerId}`, JSON.stringify(dynamoResult.Item.data), 'EX', 3600 // 1 hour expiry ); return dynamoResult.Item.data; } // Fetch from Stripe const customer = await stripe.customers.retrieve(customerId); // Update both cache layers await Promise.all([ redis.set( `customer:${customerId}`, JSON.stringify(customer), 'EX', 3600 ), dynamodb.put({ TableName: 'stripe-cache', Item: { pk: `customer:${customerId}`, data: customer, ttl: Math.floor(Date.now() / 1000) + 86400 // 24 hour TTL } }).promise() ]); return customer; }

DynamoDB table design

The DynamoDB table design needs to support efficient lookups, automatic TTL cleanup, and flexible data storage for various Stripe entity types. Here the table design defined in CloudFormation:

AWSTemplateFormatVersion: '2010-09-09' Description: 'DynamoDB table for Stripe API caching with GSI and TTL' Parameters: Environment: Type: String Default: dev AllowedValues: - dev - staging - prod Description: Environment name for the stack TableReadCapacity: Type: Number Default: 5 Description: Read capacity units for the table MinValue: 1 TableWriteCapacity: Type: Number Default: 5 Description: Write capacity units for the table MinValue: 1 GSIReadCapacity: Type: Number Default: 5 Description: Read capacity units for GSI MinValue: 1 GSIWriteCapacity: Type: Number Default: 5 Description: Write capacity units for GSI MinValue: 1 Conditions: IsProd: !Equals - !Ref Environment - prod Resources: StripeCacheTable: Type: AWS::DynamoDB::Table Properties: TableName: !Sub stripe-cache-${Environment} BillingMode: PROVISIONED ProvisionedThroughput: ReadCapacityUnits: !If - IsProd - 50 - !Ref TableReadCapacity WriteCapacityUnits: !If - IsProd - 50 - !Ref TableWriteCapacity AttributeDefinitions: - AttributeName: pk AttributeType: S - AttributeName: sk AttributeType: S - AttributeName: gsi1pk AttributeType: S - AttributeName: gsi1sk AttributeType: S KeySchema: - AttributeName: pk KeyType: HASH - AttributeName: sk KeyType: RANGE GlobalSecondaryIndexes: - IndexName: gsi1 KeySchema: - AttributeName: gsi1pk KeyType: HASH - AttributeName: gsi1sk KeyType: RANGE Projection: ProjectionType: ALL ProvisionedThroughput: ReadCapacityUnits: !If - IsProd - 25 - !Ref GSIReadCapacity WriteCapacityUnits: !If - IsProd - 25 - !Ref GSIWriteCapacity TimeToLiveSpecification: AttributeName: ttl Enabled: true Tags: - Key: Environment Value: !Ref Environment - Key: Service Value: stripe-cache - Key: ManagedBy Value: CloudFormation Outputs: TableName: Description: Name of the DynamoDB table Value: !Ref StripeCacheTable Export: Name: !Sub ${AWS::StackName}-TableName TableArn: Description: ARN of the DynamoDB table Value: !GetAtt StripeCacheTable.Arn Export: Name: !Sub ${AWS::StackName}-TableArn

The CloudFormation template implements a production-ready DynamoDB table design optimized for caching Stripe API responses. At its core, the table uses a composite key structure with partition and sort keys (pk and sk) to enable flexible querying patterns, while a Global Secondary Index (gsi1) supports efficient lookups by cache type and timestamp. The template incorporates TTL functionality for automatic cleanup of expired cache entries. The infrastructure is environment-aware, with built-in parameter customization that allows for different capacity settings across development, staging, and production environments.

The table uses a composite key structure to support various access patterns:

// Example item structure { pk: 'CUSTOMER#cus_123', // Partition key sk: 'METADATA#latest', // Sort key gsi1pk: 'CACHE#customer', // GSI partition key gsi1sk: '2025-02-05T12:00:00Z', // GSI sort key for TTL ordering data: { // Stripe customer object id: 'cus_123', email: 'customer@example.com', // ... other Stripe fields }, ttl: 1707225600, // Unix timestamp for TTL lastUpdated: '2025-02-05T12:00:00Z', version: 1, checksum: 'abc123' // For data integrity verification }

Some of the notable design decisions here include:

  1. Composite Keys: The composite key structure (pk + sk) supports multiple item types per customer:
// Primary keys for different item types const keys = { customerMetadata: { pk: `CUSTOMER#${customerId}`, sk: 'METADATA#latest' }, customerSubscriptions: { pk: `CUSTOMER#${customerId}`, sk: 'SUBSCRIPTIONS#latest' }, customerPaymentMethods: { pk: `CUSTOMER#${customerId}`, sk: 'PAYMENT_METHODS#latest' } };
  1. Global Secondary Index (GSI): The GSI enables efficient queries for finding all cached items of a specific type, identifying stale cache entries, and supporting bulk cache invalidation.
// Query all cached customers updated before a timestamp async function findStaleCustomers(timestamp) { const result = await dynamodb.query({ TableName: 'stripe-cache', IndexName: 'gsi1', KeyConditionExpression: 'gsi1pk = :type AND gsi1sk < :timestamp', ExpressionAttributeValues: { ':type': 'CACHE#customer', ':timestamp': timestamp } }).promise(); return result.Items; }
  1. Data Versioning: A version field can help handle concurrent updates:
async function updateCustomerCache(customerId, data) { try { await dynamodb.put({ TableName: 'stripe-cache', Item: { pk: `CUSTOMER#${customerId}`, sk: 'METADATA#latest', data: data, version: 1, ttl: Math.floor(Date.now() / 1000) + 86400, lastUpdated: new Date().toISOString(), checksum: calculateChecksum(data) }, ConditionExpression: 'attribute_not_exists(version) OR version < :newVersion', ExpressionAttributeValues: { ':newVersion': 1 } }).promise(); } catch (error) { if (error.code === 'ConditionalCheckFailedException') { // Handle concurrent update conflict await handleUpdateConflict(customerId, data); } throw error; } }
  1. TTL Management: The TTL attribute enables automatic cleanup of expired items:
// Calculate TTL based on item type function calculateTTL(itemType) { const ttlMap = { 'customer': 86400, // 24 hours 'subscription': 3600, // 1 hour 'payment_method': 7200 // 2 hours }; const ttlSeconds = ttlMap[itemType] || 86400; return Math.floor(Date.now() / 1000) + ttlSeconds; }

This table design provides a flexible and scalable foundation for caching Stripe API responses while supporting various access patterns and maintaining data integrity. The combination of composite keys, GSI, and TTL enables efficient queries and automatic cleanup of stale data.

Cache invalidation strategy

Cache invalidation is important for maintaining data consistency. You can implement a webhook-based invalidation strategy, enabling you to invalidate individual items when new data arrives from Stripe:

async function handleStripeWebhook(event) { const { type, data } = event; // Determine cache keys to invalidate based on event type const keysToInvalidate = getCacheKeysForEvent(type, data); // Invalidate Redis cache const redis = getRedisClient(); await Promise.all( keysToInvalidate.map(key => redis.del(key)) ); // Invalidate DynamoDB cache by updating TTL await Promise.all( keysToInvalidate.map(key => dynamodb.update({ TableName: 'stripe-cache', Key: { pk: key }, UpdateExpression: 'set ttl = :ttl', ExpressionAttributeValues: { ':ttl': Math.floor(Date.now() / 1000) } }).promise() ) ); }

Performance optimization tips

There are a number of steps that can help improve the performance of this approach:

  1. Redis Connection Pooling: Configure your Redis client with appropriate connection pool settings for Lambda:
const redisOptions = { maxRetriesPerRequest: 1, enableReadyCheck: false, connectTimeout: 500, disconnectTimeout: 2000 };
  1. DynamoDB Capacity Planning: Use on-demand capacity mode for unpredictable workloads, or carefully provision capacity based on your access patterns:
const tableParams = { BillingMode: 'PAY_PER_REQUEST', // Or for provisioned capacity: ProvisionedThroughput: { ReadCapacityUnits: 100, WriteCapacityUnits: 50 } };
  1. Lambda Configuration: Optimize memory allocation and timeout settings. Memory is a component of Lambda billing, so ensure your functions are not allocated more memory than necessary. Timeout settings can ensure that a function is terminated if it unexpectedly takes too long. Both of these settings can help reduce costs, especially in high throughput workloads. These can be set in CloudFormation and other infrastructure-as-code (IaC) tools, as well as the Lambda console:
Resources: StripeCacheFunction: Type: AWS::Serverless::Function Properties: MemorySize: 1024 Timeout: 10

Cost considerations

For a distributed caching solution for Stripe API integration, several key AWS service costs must be carefully managed. ElastiCache nodes accrue charges on an hourly basis whether you're actively using them or not. This forms one of your primary ongoing expenses, alongside the dual costs of DynamoDB – both for storing your cached data and for the request units consumed during your read and write operations. Your serverless compute layer, running on Lambda, adds another dimension to the cost structure through execution time and memory allocation charges. Tying all of these components together is the often-overlooked cost of data transfer between services, which can become significant in high-throughput systems.

Fortunately, several strategies can help optimize these costs without compromising performance. The foundation of cost optimization starts with right-sizing your ElastiCache nodes – selecting instance types that match your actual working set size rather than overprovisioning for potential future growth. This goes hand-in-hand with implementing intelligent TTL policies across both your cache layers, ensuring that stale data doesn't consume costly storage space in DynamoDB or memory in ElastiCache. For your Lambda functions, implementing batch processing patterns can significantly reduce the number of invocations and their associated costs. Perhaps most importantly, maintaining visibility into your cache hit rates through careful monitoring allows you to continuously adjust your storage allocations and caching policies based on real usage patterns, ensuring you're not paying for capacity you don't need while maintaining optimal performance for your users.

Conclusion

This example caching architecture provides a solution for scaling Stripe API access in high-volume applications. By using ElastiCache, DynamoDB, and Lambda effectively, you can significantly reduce API latency and costs while maintaining data consistency and respecting rate limits.

Remember to:

  1. Regularly monitor and adjust cache TTLs based on your data freshness requirements.

  2. Implement proper error handling and fallback mechanisms.

  3. Keep your Stripe webhook endpoints updated for cache invalidation.

  4. Monitor costs across all services to ensure optimal resource utilization.

Additional Resources:

For more Stripe learning resources, subscribe to our YouTube channel.

/Related Articles
[ Fig. 1 ]
10x
Resolving production issues in your AWS/Stripe integration using Workbench
This blog shows how to find when something is wrong in production, avoid jumping between tabs/docs to find information, and resolving issues quickly...
Workbench
AWS
[ Fig. 2 ]
10x
Advanced error handling patterns for Stripe enterprise developers
This post demonstrates some more advanced patterns to help you build resilient and robust payment systems to integrate Stripe with your enterprise...
Workbench
Error Handling